• See McKenna, M., & Russell, P. (eds.), 2008, Free Will and Reactive Attitudes: Perspectives on P.F. StrawsonsFreedom and resentment”, Farnham: Ashgate.
  • See Shoemaker, D., & Tognazzini, N. (eds.), 2015, Oxford Studies in Agency and Responsibility (Volume 2: ‘Freedom and Resentment’ at 50), Oxford: Oxford University Press.

This links together a lot of the sociality of personhood stuff with the trust/reliance stuff and various other things. The sociality of personhood, moral knowledge, and responsibility Trust Essay notes Should charitable interpretation preserve truth or virtue

Could frame this as a response to this https://rebelhumanist.blogspot.com/2024/07/the-triangle-of-other-people.html

Are buddhist views of e.g. actions as arising from seeds of anger or various other sub-personal processes rather than an overall faculty of the person a 3rd way between the two? It doesn’t feel as cold as the objective view cartoon I had in my head about this. Does that say nuances of moral psychology/how an agent-system functions is quite important, and can’t be treated as a black box in free will debates?