https://pamela-robinson.com/research/ for nice moral uncertainty models and other stuff
How does this relate to logical uncertainty?
Is it related to finite thinkers like Gaifman’s Reasoning with Limited Resources and Assigning Probabilities to Arithmetical Statements suggests?
Does all this relate to Holton and other’s models of intention, judgment, and belief as a settled attitude which is necessary for finite thinkers to use to avoid thrashing.Holton’s Intention as a Model for Belief The Sources of Normativity (Tanner lectures)
Contra Nihilism cf. Carlsmith’s stuff on moral realism and the burning house stuff
Irrelevance of nihilism might be able to be captured as being a positive affine transformation of all possible utility functions. I wonder if that breaks at any point, e.g. around reducing uncertainty about the truth of nihilism or other ethics?
How is could it be true that there’s always the question of what ought you do, but everything/consciousness is also fundamentally ok? Is there no imperative but always an interrogative?